Appendix E: Second Paper Excerpt
- A second excerpt from my paper “Test Administration and Report: The WIAT-II”
describing the computer-assisted conversion of scores, and the resulting interpretation.
- This excerpt illustrates my knowledge of technological innovation in the
testing arena, and the subsequent application of the results.
- It reflects an understanding and use of the following standards
by category:
CCCT
|
CTTC |
ISTE/NETS |
I-1a,b; 4b; 5b; 6a,b
II -3e,f; 5b; 7e
III- 1; 2b; 3a; 5c; 6b
|
II-D;
III-C;
IV-C |
1a1-1a6; 1a11; 1a13
2c;
3b;
4a,b |
|
Test Results, Analysis, and Recommendations
The next step was to determine raw scores, by filling in the blanks of a scoring sheet after following scoring directions. Once completed by section, I entered these results in the spaces provided in a computer
program designed to convert raw scores to standard, and within seconds a report was generated that gave the Standard Scores,
as well as Age Equivalent (which my school used), Grade Equivalent, and other information.
Prior to my giving the WIAT-II, the school psychologist had been performed a complete psychological evaluation that
resulted in a full-scale IQ. This was to be used in the next assessment phase.
Unfortunately, I would be unable to participate in this next aspect of evaluation. The school year was rapidly ending, this next process had to be completed while staff
was still available, and I had my own classes to conduct. The process, as described
to me, used a Regression Chart, and a specific starting value on the chart of 55, the base of the upper functioning MR range.
Jessie’s IQ and Standardized Scores were combined to establish whether there was a need for IEP goals to be written
in particular disciplines. My decidedly amateurish interpretation based on just
the age-level results and observations of Jessie’s difficulties while taking the test led me to suspect that goals would
be written in all areas. I would have recommended paraprofessional support when
feasible, emphasis on organizational skills, and a very careful watch of Jessie’s socialization at the high school. Having an older sister to help was a dual-edged sword; her sister was popular, and
had several boyfriends. This was an area of great interest to Jessie already – one hoped it would not become a problem.
The school psychologist, in concert with the eighth grade special education teacher, interpreted the converted information. Within two days, they wrote Jessie’s new IEP goals. I learned that though there
is a “cut-off” for goals (a number above or below that determined the necessity for them to be written) that this
operation could employ professional judgment when the cut-off numbers and those generated by the assessment were very close. While I was not shown their
results (due to the necessity of delivering the information quickly to the high school), I was told that in the fall Jessie will be attending school with IEP goals created in all areas: reading, mathematics,
and writing, and support was provided for the areas of concern that I had noted.
|