George H. Adams - ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO

Appendix E

Home
Philosophy
Matrix
Resume
Narrative Strands
References
Curricular Units
Appendices

Appendix E: Second Paper Excerpt

  1. A second excerpt from my paper “Test Administration and Report: The WIAT-II” describing the computer-assisted conversion of scores, and the resulting interpretation.
  2. This excerpt illustrates my knowledge of technological innovation in the testing arena, and the subsequent application of the results.
  3. It reflects an understanding and use of the following standards by category:

CCCT

 

CTTC

ISTE/NETS

I-1a,b; 4b; 5b; 6a,b

 II -3e,f; 5b; 7e

 III- 1; 2b; 3a; 5c; 6b

 

 II-D;

III-C;

IV-C

 1a1-1a6; 1a11; 1a13

2c;

3b;

4a,b

Test Results, Analysis, and Recommendations

The next step was to determine raw scores, by filling in the blanks of a scoring sheet after following scoring directions.  Once completed by section, I entered these results in the spaces provided in a computer program designed to convert raw scores to standard, and within seconds a report was generated that gave the Standard Scores, as well as Age Equivalent (which my school used), Grade Equivalent, and other information. 

Prior to my giving the WIAT-II, the school psychologist had been performed a complete psychological evaluation that resulted in a full-scale IQ.  This was to be used in the next assessment phase.  Unfortunately, I would be unable to participate in this next aspect of evaluation.  The school year was rapidly ending, this next process had to be completed while staff was still available, and I had my own classes to conduct.  The process, as described to me, used a Regression Chart, and a specific starting value on the chart of 55, the base of the upper functioning MR range. Jessie’s IQ and Standardized Scores were combined to establish whether there was a need for IEP goals to be written in particular disciplines.  My decidedly amateurish interpretation based on just the age-level results and observations of Jessie’s difficulties while taking the test led me to suspect that goals would be written in all areas.  I would have recommended paraprofessional support when feasible, emphasis on organizational skills, and a very careful watch of Jessie’s socialization at the high school.  Having an older sister to help was a dual-edged sword; her sister was popular, and had several boyfriends. This was an area of great interest to Jessie already – one hoped it would not become a problem.

The school psychologist, in concert with the eighth grade special education teacher, interpreted the converted information.  Within two days, they wrote Jessie’s new IEP goals. I learned that though there is a “cut-off” for goals (a number above or below that determined the necessity for them to be written) that this operation could employ professional judgment when the cut-off numbers and those generated by the assessment were very close.  While I was not shown their results (due to the necessity of delivering the information quickly to the high school), I was told that  in the fall Jessie will be attending school with IEP goals created in all areas: reading, mathematics, and writing, and support was provided for the areas of concern that I had noted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Appendix D                    To Appendix F                   Back To Narrative Strands